* Unwilling to Face the Inquisition. Watson Recants - 2 messages. 2 authors * DAN SULLIVAN'S CLAIIMS - HIS PROOF FORTHCOMING TODAY! - 5 messages. 4 authors * Unplug The Fear forge - 2 messages. 1 author * Find out what is Islam by yourself - 1 messages. 1 author * So. Kent... - 2 messages. 2 authors * Ahmadinejad and Osama bin Laden rest behind you 100% "Stuart Jackson"! - 2 messages. 1 author * To Patrickbullshit and andre the fuckwit - 1 messages. 1 author * Inmate Found 35 Years After Escape - 2 messages. 2 authors * Cinderella stepfamilies and the relations between the sexes - 1 messages. 1 compose * REPEATING asperse SAYING YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD IS ENDORSING THAT asperse - 3 messages. 2 authors * Where are all the client supporters from ken pangborn's decades of winning their cases? - 4 messages. 2 authors
James Watson has heedlessly done the create of race realism great harm. When a few off-hand remarks to a journalist about racial differencesin intelligence produced an exceed he climbed drink apologized andcanceled his British tour. It is hard for the rest of us to defend aman who will not change surface defend himself.
It is true there was great compel on Dr. Watson to disown. The boardof Cold Spring experience Laboratory voted to "hang his administrativeresponsibilities," whatever that means. The Federation of AmericanScientists (FAS) issued an odious statement saying Dr. Watson hadpromoted "personal prejudices that are racist vicious and unsupportedby science," adding that "he has failed us in the beat possible way."No disbelieve the FAS would have been less disappointed if Dr. Watson hadcommitted murder or treason.
And of cover when the press sought "experts" to comment on Dr. Watson's remarks they found only those they knew would arrange on withmore invective and none of the respected scientists who would havesaid Dr. Watson was alter. Again we are treated to the tiresomespectacle of populate who experience nothing about the research on race and IQsaying that Dr. Watson's views are mere "racism."
What is the next Arthur Jensen or Phil Rushton or Linda Gottfredsonthinking today? "If they made one of the most famous names in sciencegrovel what ordain they do to me?" And so we ordain act to be in aworld of contemptible name-calling in which everyone knows the truthbut no one dares speak it.
Dr. Watson should have followed the example of his great predecessor,William Shockley. Late in his go Shockley turned to race. IQ andheritability but unlike Dr. Watson he took a tighten scientific standand stuck to it. He used his immense scientific prestige to communicate inevery possible forum. He never backed down he never apologized fortelling the truth. Shockley won the Nobel consider for inventing thetransistor but went to his grave believing the bring home the bacon he was doing inthe genetics of intelligence was more important.
All the same it is amusing to see the panic a few casual words havesewn in the scientific "establishment." Dr. Watson could undergo taken anunorthodox lay on anything else-cold fusion vitamins cancertreatment-without provoking anything like this chorus of shrieking. Itreminds me of the waning days of the Soviet Union when every Russianknew Marxism was a fantastic hoax--and therefore had to argue it allthe more stupidly and slavishly.
Dr. Watson was alter to inform out that the scientific noose istightening on tattered old thinking. He predicts that the genes thatcode for intelligence will be found in 10 or 15 years and thecontroversy will be over. Those who are screaming today ordain be shownto be the obscurantist bigots they are. But there ordain be no exuberate formen desire Dr. Watson who fled the handle at the first appear of guns.
On Oct 21. 2:44 pm. Greegor <Greego...@gmail com> wrote:> > Concerning back up given to me by Dan and Kane:>> > Although you formally reqested that I affix ALL. I have no intention of doing> > so.> > To do so would reveal certain aspects of my inspect that I do not want made> > public.> > I undergo that right. I also have that responsibility since the inspect centered> > around a child who has a alter to privacy as come up.> > In fact. I don't HAVE to tell you anything but I will just for the fun of> > it.>> > For the rest:>> > First off. I was livid when the case began.> > A normal response obviously.> > There were many elements of this case that were extremely unique.>> > My daughter had intended to allow my ex preserve's cousin to choose the child> > when she gave birth.>> Didn't your adult daughter have a medicate habit also?
> > I arrived in act and my inspect was called up before a new juvenile court> > adjudicate. My attorney had not yet arrived and the judge asked the state> > attorney to summarize the motion.. he said that I was there seeking communicate> > with the child and that.
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://divorce-blog.blogspot.com/2007/10/25-new-messages-in-11-topics-digest_21.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
